Wing Chun Kuen Awakening

This is a promotion for our customers who have purchased our Book 1 and 2 of Wing Chun Kuen Awakening. If you purchase both books between the dates of 2018 Feb 9th to 16th, then you  may be eligible to participate enter this lucky draw to win a free guidance via Facebook (guidance is usually paid but it's free for this lucky draw). How does it work? You shall read through Book 1 and 2. Raise your questions during the free guidance via private message. The guide will go through the points of the books with you to solve the scientific errors of the mainstream Wing Chun so that your Wing Chun may become more scientific and workable. How to enter this lucky draw? Purchase both books from Amazon, iBooks or any online bookstores that are selling them. Submit the screen shots of your receipts via Facebook private message. If you are selected, you will be notified through the same private message. This lucky draw expires on 2018 Feb 17th, if we don't receive any recei...

Most people who have been checking on YouTube for the videos of the mainstream Wing Chun should have noticed that they have lots of artificial theories and techniques unlike the other martial arts. And yet there are lots of videos on YouTube that show the failures of the mainstream Wing Chun (this means that their artificial techniques don't work because they're unscientific). In our disclosure, we explain why is there such a phenomenon. We also provide the explanation of how to resolve the scientific errors. These are the things that we debunk (mainstream Wing Chun): It's a hard style rather than a soft style. Chi Sao is not soft, it should be hard. There's no wrist snap at the moment of impact. This wrong execution is caused by the wrong use of body mechanics. There's no elbow energy. There's no forward energy the way that the mainstream Wing Chun schools are teaching. Basically, the disclosure debunks many things and show that they are unsci...

If you are considering to get our books of Wing Chun Kuen Awakening but you're unsure how reliable is our disclosure, then this post may clarify your doubts. We mentioned that our disclosure has scientific validity, so how did we use scientific means to confirm that the mainstream Wing Chun instruction is unscientific? We analyzed different versions of the mainstream Wing Chun. We realized that the techniques could not be used in action and they created side effects such as ailments (abnormal soreness on the body). We analyzed other martial arts to see if they had those ill effects like the mainstream Wing Chun.  We analyzed and checked other martial arts vs mainstream Wing Chun to see what was "different" about this mainstream Wing Chun. We checked the techniques and attributes such as speed, power, balance, etc. and their effects on the practitioners. Conclusion: We uncovered that the instructions of other martial arts are more scientific and they belong to...

This experiment is recommended in our disclosure. We have been receiving many comments from some mainstream Wing Chun practitioners who insist that there's no way that our disclosure is valid because their mainstream WC had "worked" for them. This is why we leave it to science and data to explain to the public and the mainstream Wing Chun guys what is wrong and what is happening. The method to test whether the instruction of the mainstream Wing Chun is scientific or unscientific is to check whether their performance of attributes is worse than an untrained person. Attributes refer to speed, power, balance, reach (of techniques), mobility, agility and reaction time. Additionally, also monitor the condition of the body while they are performing the techniques. In our disclosure, we recommend that a few participants should participate in this experiment. If fairness is a must, then you should try to get participants with similar physique and experience. Get 5 par...

Dear followers and readers, There's no need for us to mention here what's our disclosure about (books of "Wing Chun Kuen Awakening"). Below are the comments by other people: Unfortunately it has been mostly diluted, I think. Once upon a time Wing Chun students actually tested what they learnt in real fights. Some masters had students who could fight better than others. People looked to these masters as having superior technique and said, "Wow, Sifu X is legit! I'm gonna learn from him." Over the years, Sifu X's teachings are passed down from one generation to the next. Like a game of telephone it's hard to tell how much of Sifu X's original teaching managed to transfer, and it's hard to go back to the source because Sifu X is long dead, and his surviving students have developed their own lineages and own interpretation of the teaching! Worse still, the students don't spar because... why bother? It's Sifu X's technique!...