How Did We Uncover that the Mainstream Wing Chun was Unscientific?
If you are considering to get our books of Wing Chun Kuen Awakening but you're unsure how reliable is our disclosure, then this post may clarify your doubts.
We mentioned that our disclosure has scientific validity, so how did we use scientific means to confirm that the mainstream Wing Chun instruction is unscientific?
- We analyzed different versions of the mainstream Wing Chun. We realized that the techniques could not be used in action and they created side effects such as ailments (abnormal soreness on the body).
- We analyzed other martial arts to see if they had those ill effects like the mainstream Wing Chun.
- We analyzed and checked other martial arts vs mainstream Wing Chun to see what was "different" about this mainstream Wing Chun.
- We checked the techniques and attributes such as speed, power, balance, etc. and their effects on the practitioners.
- Conclusion: We uncovered that the instructions of other martial arts are more scientific and they belong to one group whereas the instruction of the mainstream Wing Chun is the odd one with unscientific techniques (clumsy footwork, weak blocks, weak strikes, robotic behavior, etc.).
- We had tested the mainstream Wing Chun with its practitioners and the results were consistently accurate.
For more information, get our books "Wing Chun Kuen Awakening" from Amazon. Liberate your Wing Chun today! Click on "Buy Books" tab now!
Source of image: Google Image
